Global and site‐specific detection of human integrin <i>α</i> 5 <i>β</i> 1 glycosylation using tandem mass spectrometry and the StrOligo algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glycans are oligosaccharides associated with proteins, and are known to confer specific functions and conformations on glycoproteins. As protein tridimensional structures are related to function, the study of glycans and their impact on protein folding can provide important information to the field of proteomics. The subdiscipline of glycomics (or glycoproteomics) is rapidly growing in importance as glycans in proteins have shown to be involved in protein-protein or protein-(drug, virus, antibody) interactions. Glycomics studies most often aim at identifying glycosylation sites, and thus are performed on deglycosylated proteins resulting in loss of site-specific details concerning the glycosylation. In order to obtain such details by mass spectrometry (MS), either whole glycoproteins must be digested and analyzed as mixtures of peptides and glycopeptides, or glycans must be isolated from glycopeptide fractions and analyzed as pools. This article describes parallel experiments involving both approaches, designed to take advantage of the StrOligo algorithm functionalities with the aim of characterizing glycosylation microheterogeneity on a specific site. A hybrid quadrupole-quadrupole-time-of-flight (QqTOF) instrument equipped with a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) source was used. Glycosylation of alpha 5 beta 1 subunits of human integrin was studied to test the methodology. The sample was divided in two aliquots, and glycans from the first aliquot were released enzymatically, labelled with 2-aminobenzamide, and identified using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and the StrOligo program. The other aliquot was digested with trypsin and the resulting peptides separated by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A specific collected fraction was then analyzed by MS before and after glycan release. These spectra allowed, by comparison, detection of a glycopeptide (several glycoforms) and elucidation of peptide sequence. Compositions of glycans present were proposed, and identification of possible glycan structures was conducted using MS/MS and StrOligo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".