MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989153356 · doi:10.2217/14796708.1.5.553

Use of atypical antipsychotics in neurodegenerative diseases

2006· article· en· W1989153356 on OpenAlexaff
Kelvin L. Chou, Joseph H. Friedman

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Neurology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseDementiaAntipsychoticDementia with Lewy bodiesPsychiatryLewy bodySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Behavioral and psychotic disturbances are common symptoms in neurodegenerative disorders, and can lead to caregiver stress, nursing home placement and mortality. There is an expanding literature evaluating the effects of atypical antipsychotic (AA) drugs for treating these problems. The results in both primary dementias and Parkinson’s disease suggest that not all AA drugs are equal in terms of efficacy or safety. Furthermore, Parkinsonian and other side effects of the AAs are important to consider when evaluating outcomes. The recent US FDA warning of increased mortality has increased uncertainty in using these drugs. This article reviews the AAs and their use in Parkinson’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease and other associated dementias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture NeurologySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207