MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

From structure topology to chemical composition. IX. Titanium silicates: revision of the crystal chemistry of lomonosovite and murmanite, Group-IV minerals

2008· article· en· W1989157453 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron microprobeCrystallographyDiffractometerChemistryGroup (periodic table)Crystal chemistryCrystal structureChemical compositionTitaniumMassifComposition (language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)MineralogyGeologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal structures of lomonosovite, ideally Na 10 Ti 4 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 (PO 4 ) 2 O 4 , a = 5.4170(7) Å, b = 7.1190(9) Å, c = 14.487(2) Å, a = 99.957(3)°, β = 96.711(3)°, γ = 90.360(3)°, V= 546.28(4) Å 3 , D calc . = 3.175 g cm“ 3 , and murmanite, ideally Na 4 Ti 4 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 4 (H 2 O) 4 , a = 5.3875(6) Å, b = 7.0579(7) Å, c = 12.176(1) Å, a = 93.511(2)°, 0 = 107.943(4)°, y = 90.093(2)°, V = 439.55(2) Å 3 , D calc . = 2.956 g.cm∼ 3 , from the Lovozero alkaline massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia, have been refined in the space group P1̄ (Z = 1) to R values of 2.64 and 4.47%, respectively, using 4572 and 2222 observed |F ° ≥ 4σF| reflections collected with a single-crystal Bruker AXS SMART APEX diffractometer with a CCD detector and Mo-Kα. radiation. Electron microprobe analysis gave empirical formulae for lomonosovite (Na 9.50 Mn 0.16 Ca 0.11 ) Σ9.77 (Ti 4+ 2.83 Nb 0.51 Mn 0.27 2+ Zr 0.11 Mg 0.11 Fe 2+ 0.10 Fe 3+ 0.06 Ta 0.01 ) Σ4.00 (Si 2.02 O 7 ) 2 (P 0.98 O 4 ) 2 (O 3.50 F 0.50 ) Σ4 , Z = 1, calculated on the basis of 22(O+F) a.p.f.u., with H 2 O determined from structure refinement and Fe 3+ /(Fe 2+ +Fe 3+ ) ratios obtained by Mössbauer spectroscopy. The crystal structures of lomonosovite and murmanite are a combination of a titanium silicate (TS) block and an intermediate (I) block. The TS block consists of HOH sheets (H-heteropolyhedral, O-octahedral), and is characterized by a planar cell based on translation vectors, t 1 and t 2 , with t 1 \ ∼5.5 and t 2 ∼7 Å and t t A t 2 close to 90°. The TS block exhibits linkage and stereochemistry typical for Group IV (Ti = 4 a.p.f.u.) of the Ti disilicate minerals: two H sheets connect to the O sheet such that two (Si 2 O 7 ) groups link to Ti polyhedra of the O sheet adjacent along t x . In murmanite and lomonosovite, the invariant part of the TS block is of composition Na 4 Ti 4 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 4 . There is no evidence of vacancy-dominant cation sites or (OH) groups in the O sheet of lomonosovite or murmanite. In lomonosovite, the I block is a framework of Na polyhedra and P tetrahedra which gives 2[Na 3 (PO) 4 ] p.f.u. In murmanite, there are four (H 2 O) groups in the intermediate space between TS blocks. In lomonosovite, TS and I blocks alternate along c. In murmanite, TS blocks are connected via hydrogen bonding. The H atoms were located and details of the hydrogen bonding are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it