The specificity of fatigue in primary biliary cirrhosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Quality of life is an important concern for patients with chronic liver disease. We sought to describe the frequency, severity, and associations of fatigue, in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). We performed association testing between PBC-40 multidomain disease-specific quality of life responses and clinical findings. Three hundred twenty-seven patients from a single clinic with PBC (94% female, 92% AMA-positive) were evaluated. The average age was 57 years and average disease duration 7.2 years. Verbally reported fatigue was noted in 48% but present in the overwhelming majority on PBC-40 completion, with 44% having moderate or severe symptoms. Of those not complaining of fatigue clinically, 25% documented moderate or severe fatigue by questionnaire. Age had an inverse relationship with fatigue (P < 0.01), whereas body mass index (BMI) was positively associated (P < 0.01), as was the presence of pruritus (P < 0.001), sicca symptoms (P < 0.001), depression (P < 0.001), fibromyalgia (P < 0.004), and scleroderma (P < 0.05). For those with varices (P < 0.05) or cirrhosis clinically (P < 0.05), higher fatigue scores were noted, although those who initially presented with noncirrhotic disease had higher scores at the time of testing (P < 0.005). Fatigue was associated with greater use of prescription medication (P < 0.01), in particular for antipruritics (cholestyramine: P < 0.001; rifampin: P < 0.001), proton pump inhibitors (P < 0.002), beta-blockers (P < 0.02), and antidepressants (P < 0.001), whereas those taking calcium and vitamin D appeared less fatigued (P < 0.05). In a multivariate model, calcium and vitamin D use, BMI, stage of disease at diagnosis, as well as symptomatic fatigue or pruritus, were significant. Biochemical response to UDCA was not associated with lower fatigue scores. CONCLUSION: Attempts at defining the biological basis of fatigue in patients with PBC, and improving its treatment, must account for its multifactoral causes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".