MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989165141 · doi:10.1021/jp001692g

Theoretical Studies of the Radiation Products of Hydroxyproline

2000· article· en· W1989165141 on OpenAlexafffund
Fuqiang Ban, James W. Gauld, Russell J. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRadicalIntramolecular forceChemistryHyperfine structurePhotochemistryProtonationDecarboxylationHydrogen bondHydrogen atom abstractionDensity functional theoryConformational isomerismProtonCrystallographyComputational chemistryIonStereochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The radiation products of hydroxyproline have been investigated using density functional theory. In the resulting radicals, the choice of the apical ring atom is found to be dependent on the nature and strength of the intramolecular hydrogen bonding. The observed hyperfine couplings previously assigned to two zwitterionic conformers of the hydroxyproline primary radical anion are found to be better described by its nonzwitterionic isomers and corresponding neutral protonated isomers. Similarly, the observed hyperfine couplings for radicals formed by cleavage of the C α −N bond (deamination) are in closest agreement with those calculated for their neutral forms. Theoretical proton hyperfine couplings support the experimental assignment of the radical cation formed by decarboxylation and the radicals resulting from hydrogen abstraction from the C 2 and C 3 positions. The proton hyperfine couplings are sensitive to the conformations of the radicals, which, in turn, are highly dependent upon the extent of intramolecular hydrogen bonding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207