Reactive oxygen species stimulate homologous recombination in plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Coping with the continuous production of free radicals is a daily routine of the cell. Despite their toxicity, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in dual physiological action – signal transduction and immune response. We analysed the influence of oxidative stress‐generating compounds, rose Bengal (RB), paraquat (PQ) and amino‐triazole (ATZ) on the genome stability of Arabidopsis using transgenic recombination‐monitoring plants. Homologous recombination frequencies in plants were increased upon the treatment with RB and PQ but not ATZ. Application of the N‐acetyl‐L‐cysteine (NAC), radicals scavenging compound, decreased the DNA damage caused by RB. Interestingly, the incubation of plants with very low concentration of RB (less than 0.2 µM) led to the subsequent increase in plant tolerance to methyl methane sulfonate (MMS): stronger plants with a lower increase of homologous recombination frequency. In contrast, the incubation of plants with 0.5 µM of RB resulted in the potentiation of the MMS effect: the weaker plants with higher frequency of recombination. The data of the present study suggest the existence of a dual concentration‐dependent role of ROS in plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".