L'aménagement du territoire au Québec, le parent pauvre des sciences régionales
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien que jouissant en apparence d’un statut enviable, l’aménagement du territoire arrive difficilement à répondre aux grands défis auxquels le Québec est confronté. Confiné à l’échelle locale de la planification depuis la fin des années 1970, il peut être assimilé à un exercice de macro zonage que relaient les plans et les réglementations d’urbanisme des municipalités locales. Cela explique en partie le désintérêt des sciences régionales à son égard. La transformation en cours de la géographie économique et la mobilisation de certains attributs de l’espace à des fins de requalification et de redynamisation des territoires semblent toutefois justifier un regain d’intérêt pour l’aménagement du territoire, aussi bien en tant que pratique que d’objet scientifique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it