Changes in hemoglobin and albumin concentration during nocturnal home hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hemoglobin (Hb) and the serum albumin (S.Alb) concentration commonly rise during seated, conventional thrice-weekly 4 to 4.5 hr hemodialysis (CHD) as a result of rapid fluid removal from the intravascular compartment. Conversely, in long, slow, recumbent nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHHD), the intra-dialytic S.Alb concentration has been shown to fall. In normal human physiology, plasma volume expansion rapidly follows recumbency and is sustained until a resumption of an upright position re-induces plasma volume contraction. The plasma protein dilution of recumbency has been suggested as the mechanism behind this finding in NHHD. Our retrospective analysis of 585 consecutive measurements of predialysis and postdialysis S.Alb and Hb taken from 71 NHHD patients confirmed an intra-dialytic fall in S.Alb (0.99% in alternate night NHHD and 1.4% in 6 nights/week NHHD) compared with an 8.4% rise in a control group of 104 CHD patients (p<0.001). Although the NHHD intra-dialytic Hb rose (3.8% in alternate night NHHD and 2.6% in 6 nights/week NHHD), this rise was significantly greater (8%) in CHD patients (p<0.001), and as physiological data confirm that recumbent dilution for albumin is greater than that for Hb, this may provide the explanation. We conclude that NHHD provides a more physiological volume milieu with the normal physiological dilution mechanisms of recumbency still operating despite the slow, steady volume reduction that accompanied longer hour and more frequent dialysis. These mechanisms are subverted, however, in CHD by the more-aggressive plasma contraction needed to attain adequate control of the intravascular volume in the face of shorter hour, less-frequent dialysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".