MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989201214 · doi:10.1080/01612840490432925

The Experience of Gatekeeping: A Psychiatric Nurse in an Emergency Department

2004· article· en· W1989201214 on OpenAlexaffabout
Margaret McArthur, Phyllis Montgomery

Bibliographic record

VenueIssues in Mental Health Nursing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGatekeepingEmergency departmentNursingPsychologyNurse practitionersMedicineMEDLINEMedical emergencyPsychiatryHealth carePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emergency departments are increasingly identified as the entry point to mental health services. In the hope of facilitating the flow of psychiatric patients through a general hospital's emergency department, experienced psychiatric nurses were asked to participate in a pilot project in a general hospital in Canada. This paper is a reflection of one emergency psychiatric nurse's (EPN) experience of her role being transformed into that of a gatekeeper. The notion of "gatekeeper" as a metaphor highlights "keeping psychiatric patients out" of an already strained emergency system. As a means to balance fiscal demands with patient care, the EPN inadvertently served to obscure entry for patients with mental illness who were seeking emergency services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIssues in Mental Health NursingSame topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207