MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989203653 · doi:10.1080/01431160050121348

Adaptive thresholding of texture towards white region normalization

2000· article· en· W1989203653 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Remote Sensing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThresholdingArtificial intelligenceColor constancyPreprocessorComputer visionComputer scienceNormalization (sociology)PixelRemote sensingImage processingPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human colour vision has the ability to recover a measure of contextdependent surface reflectance from observed areas. This can be seen as an analogue to radiometric corrections employed in remote sensing. Procedures based on human colour vision applied in the context of remote sensing could simplify image preprocessing and classification. This study evaluates an algorithm based on Land's colour vision or 'retinex' theory. When tested on remotely sensed images, the algorithm had difficulty coping with the presence of image texture. A new framework is presented that adapts Land's procedure to processing of remotely sensed images using adaptive thresholding techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it