Flat-plate single-crystal silicon sample holders for neutron powder diffraction studies of highly absorbing gadolinium compounds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extreme absorption cross section of natural gadolinium has so far precluded routine neutron diffraction work on its alloys and compounds. However, it is shown here that an easily constructed flat-plate sample holder with silicon single-crystal windows can be used to place a thin layer of material in a neutron beam and obtain Rietveld refinement quality diffraction data in a modest time. The flat-plate geometry uses a large area to compensate for the necessarily thin sample. Demonstration data are presented on two intermetallic compounds, Sm 3 Ag 4 Sn 4 and Gd 3 Ag 4 Sn 4 , and it is shown that both structural and magnetic information can be derived from the diffraction patterns. By working at a wavelength of 2.37 Å, it is possible to observe the low- Q diffraction peaks associated with magnetic ordering. This simple methodology should now enable routine measurements on even the most highly absorbing materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it