MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989205159 · doi:10.1002/masy.200550207

Study of Molecular Orientation by Vibrational Spectroscopy: From Polymers to Silk

2005· article· en· W1989205159 on OpenAlex
Christian Pellerin, Marie‐Eve Rousseau, Mathieu Côté, Michel Pézolet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Symposia · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilk-based biomaterials and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyreneRaman spectroscopyMacromoleculeSILKMaterials scienceLinear dichroismInfrared spectroscopyInfraredPolymerDichroismBombyx moriRelaxation (psychology)SpectroscopyPolarization (electrochemistry)Chemical physicsCrystallographyChemistryOpticsPhysical chemistryCircular dichroismComposite materialOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Infrared and Raman spectroscopies are very efficient techniques to characterize molecular orientation in macromolecular systems. In the present paper, two examples of the application of vibrational spectroscopy to the study of molecular orientation in synthetic and natural macromolecules will be presented. In the first example, the dynamics of orientation and relaxation of stretched films of bimodal blends of polystyrene (PS) and deuterated polystyrene (dPS) has been studied in situ by polarization modulation infrared linear dichroism while, in the second one, polarized Raman microspectroscopy has been used to determined quantitatively the orientation of β‐sheet domains in single filaments of Bombyx mori silk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it