Les pratiques de socialisation marginalisée des jeunes de la rue dans l’espace urbain montréalais
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En rupture avec les formes traditionnelles d’insertion, les jeunes de la rue, à Montréal, institueraient de façon précaire un certain usage de la marge sociospatiale urbaine dans la perspective d’une recomposition identitaire. Cette marge sociospatiale est présentée comme une organisation géographique structurant les pratiques d’appropriation de lieux. L’auteur nous invite à comprendre théoriquement le lien qui unit le processus identitaire à l’espace. C’est à partir des concepts-clés d’ espace transitionnel et de trajectoire géographique qu’il serait possible d’identifier un parcours géo-social des jeunes de la rue. Aussi, pour évaluer le potentiel de socialisation marginalisée des jeunes de la rue, il importe de considérer le contexte de revitalisation du centre-est de Montréal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".