MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nursing Care of Patients with Late-Stage Parkinsonʼs Disease

2003· review· en· W1989217584 on OpenAlex
Susan Calne, Ajit Kumar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Nursing · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPacific Centre for Reproductive Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParkinson's diseaseDiseaseMoodNursing carePsychological interventionIntensive care medicineAdverse effectNursing Interventions ClassificationNursingPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients in the late stages of Parkinson's disease may be significantly disabled for many years, often because of their increasing inability to tolerate therapeutic doses of antiparkinson drugs. Their status and management have been overlooked in the literature. Few current healthcare professionals have cared for patients with Parkinson's disease in the prelevodopa era and do not understand how severe and protracted the illness can be without effective treatment. This article describes a practical approach to the nursing management of severely affected patients (i.e., Hoehn and Yahr Stage 4-5) who no longer derive consistent, therapeutic benefit from their drugs. Specific problems these patients face are adverse drug reactions such as postural hypotension, psychosis, and confusion, as well as difficulties with nutrition, elimination, mobility and falling, communication, sexuality, memory, and mood. Nursing interventions can help minimize the effect of these problems on the patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it