Capillary electrophoresis sequencing of small ssDNA molecules <b><i>versus</i></b> the Ogston regime: Fitting data and interpreting parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the mobility of short ssDNA fragments (approximately 30-500 bases) separated by capillary electrophoresis in entangled polymer solutions. Although this corresponds to what is commonly called the Ogston regime, the corresponding sieving concept has never been defined properly nor tested quantitatively. We consider three formulas that have been suggested to fit data in this range of ssDNA sizes, and we discuss how their free parameters are related to actual physical parameters. We test these formulas with new data obtained in our laboratory using a commercial poly-N,N-dimethylacrylamide sieving matrix. Our results show that all three formulas provide decent fits. However, the traditional Ogston equation produces fitting parameters that appear to lack physical meaning. Surprisingly, all three approaches predict that the effective pore size and fiber radius are almost equal. This is the first step towards the development of a systematic approach to optimizing sequencing systems for this size range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".