MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989237366 · doi:10.4000/anabases.2733

Enseigner autrement les Humanités classiques en Europe : propositions à partir du cas français

2006· article· fr· W1989237366 on OpenAlex
Stéphane Ratti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnabases · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education, Recreation and Sports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'INTRT POUR L'ANTIQUIT grco-romaine n'a jamais t aussi fort en France. L'attestent les nombreux voyages scolaires organiss par les tablissements secondaires (Grce, Rome, Pompi, Sicile, Afrique du Nord), les changes entre tablissements et familles, le dveloppement des clubs de lecture et d'apprentissage du grec ancien. La vitalit des publications en traduction des auteurs antiques constitue un autre signe de cet intrt pour l'Antiquit. C'est donc peu de dire que ce mouvement se dveloppe une poque o la recherche des racines et la rflexion sur les thmes lis la citoyennet connaissent un nouvel lan. La place de la culture gnrale dans les formations universitaires est aujourd'hui l'objet d'une rflexion approfondie mene au sein de la Mission d'tude et de Proposition cre en juillet 2001 1 . Une autre mission ministrielle a cherch paralllement redfinir les objectifs des Humanits classiques en liaison notamment avec la perspective de la constitution d'un socle culturel commun aux pays de l'Europe largie 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it