Enseigner autrement les Humanités classiques en Europe : propositions à partir du cas français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'INTRT POUR L'ANTIQUIT grco-romaine n'a jamais t aussi fort en France. L'attestent les nombreux voyages scolaires organiss par les tablissements secondaires (Grce, Rome, Pompi, Sicile, Afrique du Nord), les changes entre tablissements et familles, le dveloppement des clubs de lecture et d'apprentissage du grec ancien. La vitalit des publications en traduction des auteurs antiques constitue un autre signe de cet intrt pour l'Antiquit. C'est donc peu de dire que ce mouvement se dveloppe une poque o la recherche des racines et la rflexion sur les thmes lis la citoyennet connaissent un nouvel lan. La place de la culture gnrale dans les formations universitaires est aujourd'hui l'objet d'une rflexion approfondie mene au sein de la Mission d'tude et de Proposition cre en juillet 2001 1 . Une autre mission ministrielle a cherch paralllement redfinir les objectifs des Humanits classiques en liaison notamment avec la perspective de la constitution d'un socle culturel commun aux pays de l'Europe largie 2 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".