Deposition of Silver Thin Films Using the Pyrazolate Complex [Ag(3,5‐(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>)]<sub>3</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The synthesis and characterization of a series of silver pyrazolate complexes [Ag(tfpz)] 3 ( 1 ), [Ag(fbpz)] 3 ( 2 ), [Ag(dbpz)] 3 ( 3 ), and [(py)Ag(tfpz)] 2 ( 4 ) are reported, for which tfpz, fbpz, dbpz are abbreviations for the pyrazolate ligands with formulae 3,5‐(CF 3 ) 2 ‐pz, 3‐ t Bu‐5‐(CF 3 )‐pz, and 3,5‐( t Bu) 2 ‐pz, respectively. These silver complexes were characterized by microanalysis and spectroscopic methods. The CF 3 ‐substituted complex 1 possesses the highest volatility and stability against thermal decomposition. Low pressure CVD experiments were conducted over the temperature range 250–350 °C. Silver metal thin films were successfully obtained on silicon wafers using pure H 2 as the carrier gas. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to reveal surface morphologies, while X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X‐ray diffraction (XRD) were utilized to determine the atomic composition of the as‐deposited thin films as well as the crystallite packing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".