MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989275862 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.1160

Enzymes active in the areas undergoing cartilage resorption during the development of the secondary ossification center in the tibiae of rats aged 0–21 days. II. Two proteinases, gelatinase B and collagenase‐3, are implicated in the lysis of collagen fibrils

2001· article· en· W1989275862 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Antonietta Davoli, Lisa Lamplugh, Annie Beauchemin, Kevin Chan, Sylvie Mordier, John S. Mort, Gillian Murphy, Andrew Docherty, Charles Philippe Leblond, Eunice R. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityShriners Hospitals for Children - Canada
FundersShriners Hospitals for Children
KeywordsResorptionGelatinaseOssification centerGelatinase ACartilageCollagenaseImmunostainingOssificationMatrix metalloproteinaseBone resorptionChondrocyteAnatomyChemistryBiologyEnzymeEndocrinologyImmunologyImmunohistochemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the transformation of the cartilaginous epiphysis into bone, the first indication of change in the surfaces destined for resorption is the cleavage of aggrecan core protein by unidentified matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (Lee et al., this issue). In cartilage areas undergoing resorption, the cleavage leaves as superficial, 6-microm-thick band of matrix, referred to as "pre-resorptive layer." This layer harbors G1-fragments of the aggrecan core protein within a framework of collagen-rich fibrils exhibiting various stages of degeneration. Investigation of this layer in every resorption area by gelatin histozymography and TIMP-2 histochemistry demonstrates the presence of an MMP whose histozymographic activity is inhibited by such a low dose of the inhibitor CT1746 as to identify it as gelatinase A or B. Attempts at blocking the histozymographic reactions with neutralizing antibodies capable of inhibiting either gelatinase A or B reveals that only those against gelatinase B do so. Immunostaining of sections with anti-gelatinase B IgG confirms the presence of gelatinase B in every pre-resorptive layer, that is, at the blind end of excavated canals (stage I; 6-day-old rats), at sites along the walls of the forming marrow space (stage II; 7days), at sites within the walls of this space as it becomes the ossification center (stage III; 9 days) and along the wall of the maturing center (stage IV; 10-21 days). We also report the presence of collagenase-3 in precisely the same sites, possibly as active enzyme, but this remains to be proven. Because the results reveal that collagenase-3 is present beside gelatinase B in every pre-resorptive layer and, because these sites exhibit various signs of degradation including fibrillar debris, reduction in fibril number, or overt loss, we propose that gelatinase B and collagenase-3 mediate the lysis of this pre-resorptive layer-most likely through a cooperative attack leading to the disintegration of the collagen fibril framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental DynamicsSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207