MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989290299 · doi:10.1115/fedsm-icnmm2010-30777

Analytical and Numerical Study of a Swirling Submerged Jet Flow

2010· article· en· W1989290299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVortexMechanicsVorticityFlow (mathematics)InstabilityJet (fluid)PhysicsDipoleClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study is conducted to investigate the details and characteristics of swirling submerged jets when transferred into a system of helical vortices downstream in a bathtub-like flow. Both analytical and numerical results are presented. In the analytical solution, upstream flow is considered to be two-dimensional with piecewise-constant vorticity profile. The instability of such a flow leads to the formation of two-dimensional dipolar or tripolar vortical structures. It is shown that the size of the vortexless annular area inside the initial vortex is a critical parameter in the two dipolar unstable or tripolar stable structure formations, and that such tripolar flow transforms downstream to a three-dimensional steady helical vortex system, which rotates as a whole and propagates in the downstream direction. The mechanism of screwing vortex filaments into a steady system of helical vortices is also presented. The numerical simulations also confirm the initiation and generation of dipolar vortex structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid dynamics and aerodynamics studiesFrench-language works237,207