MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989308788 · doi:10.7202/201388ar

Paul Lejeune ou le missionnaire possédé

2006· article· fr· W1989308788 on OpenAlex
Pierre Berthiaume

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au cours de l'hiver 1633-1634, le jésuite Paul Lejeune accompagne des Montagnais sur « la Côte-du-Sud » et doit affronter Carigonan, le « sorcier » du clan. Mais la « guerre déclarée » de Lejeune contre ce dernier ne manque pas de bizarrerie : au lieu d'opposer les « lumières » de la foi aux superstitions du chamanisme, elle révèle un singulier désordre mental chez le missionnaire qui se laisse prendre au piège de la pensée animiste qu'il combat. Tout le récit de Lejeune illustre sa disgrâce aux mains du « misérable Sorcier », dont, à l'instar des autres missionnaires de la Compagnie de Jésus, il hésite pourtant à reconnaître le statut démoniaque. Mais peut-être l'échec de Lejeune s'explique-t-il par la parenté qui existe entre les procédures inquisitoriales pratiquées au XVII e siècle et les assises sur lesquelles repose le chamanisme amérindien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it