MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989315313 · doi:10.1353/mou.2010.0012

Syncretism and Ancient Chronology: Can Democritus Date the Buddha?

2009· article· fr· W1989315313 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Graham Hagens

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGautama BuddhaChronologySyncretism (linguistics)PersianEmpireAncient historyHistoryPhilosophyLiteratureBuddhismArchaeologyArtTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le rôle important joué par les échanges de nouveaux concepts dans la naissance des philosophies occidentale et sud-asiatique est reconnu, mais son processus reste encore et toujours mal compris. Nous abordons ce problème par la chronologie des débuts de la philosophie grecque et de celle des mouvements religieux sudasiatiques. Les diverses similarités entre d’une part la philosophie présocratique et d’autre part les enseignements de Siddartha Gautama et de ses proches contemporains nous font penser que ces tous développements se sont déroulés sous l’empire achéménide. En plaçant ainsi la vie du Bouddha au Ve siècle, nous proposons une date plus haute de plus d’un siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaSame topicIndian and Buddhist StudiesFrench-language works237,207