MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989339181 · doi:10.1177/1077546314548909

A normalized Hilbert-Huang transform technique for bearing fault detection

2014· article· en· W1989339181 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)VibrationFault detection and isolationRobustness (evolution)Fault (geology)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceKurtosisHilbert transformCondition monitoringEngineeringSIGNAL (programming language)Signal processingNoise reductionPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)AcousticsElectronic engineeringComputer visionMathematicsDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bearings are commonly used in rotary machinery, whereas up to half of machinery malfunctions could be related to bearing defects. Unfortunately reliable fault detection systems still remain a challenging task, especially when bearing defect-related features are nonstationary. A new normalized Hilbert-Huang transform (NHHT) technique is proposed in this paper for vibration-based bearing fault detection. The NHHT for bearing fault detection takes two processes: firstly the vibration signal is denoised to highlight defect-related impulses; and secondly representative features are extracted for bearing fault detection. Vibration signal denoising is carried out by the use of the maximum kurtosis deconvolution filter to reduce impedance effect of transmission path of the measured vibration signal. A novel strategy based on D’Agostino-Person normality is suggested to enhance the distinctive intrinsic mode functions for representative features extraction and formulation for bearing fault detection. The effectiveness of the proposed NHHT technique is verified by a series of experimental tests corresponding to different bearing health conditions, and its robustness in bearing fault detection is examined by the use of data sets from a different experimental setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it