MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989380178 · doi:10.1063/1.1565491

Carrier-density-wave transport property depth profilometry using spectroscopic photothermal radiometry of silicon wafers II: Experimental and computational aspects

2003· article· en· W1989380178 on OpenAlexafffund
Derrick Shaughnessy, Andreas Mandelis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaferWavelengthExcitationSIGNAL (programming language)RadiometryOpticsMaterials scienceSiliconPhotothermal spectroscopyPhotothermal therapyOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The experimental verification of a previously presented theoretical model for the photothermal radiometric (PTR) signal from an Si wafer excited by a laser of arbitrary wavelength is presented. A multiparameter fitting algorithm is developed and is used to fit experimental frequency scans to the theoretical model. The recombination lifetime and surface recombination velocity values extracted from the fits are consistent for all of the experiments performed. The diffusion coefficients for the more strongly absorbed excitation wavelengths are greater than those measured when using deeper penetrating excitation wavelengths. This discrepancy is discussed in terms of the dependence of the PTR signal on injected carrier densities and the nonlinearity of the PTR signal with temperature. The sensitivity of the PTR signal to a localized defect is shown to increase with the proximity of the defect to the centroid of the injected carrier density. The method amounts to carrier-density-wave depth profilometry of the relevant electronic transport parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207