MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989412716 · doi:10.1159/000233575

Demonstration of Long-Lived Memory T Suppressor Cells in the IgE Response

2009· article· en· W1989412716 on OpenAlexaff
Kent T. HayGlass, Gill H. Strejan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsImmunoglobulin EImmunologyOvalbuminSpleenAdoptive cell transferAntibodyImmunizationAntigenSensitizationSuppressorMedicineImmune systemT cellInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Administration to mice of repeated small doses of glutaraldehyde-polymerized ovalbumin (OA-POL) results in drastic suppression of the IgE antibody response. The high anamnestic IgE antibody responses usually obtained after 2 injections of native OA in alum were completely abrogated when OA-POL was administered between the 2 immunizations. Treatment with OA-POL prior to a primary immunization with 2 micrograms DNP-OA in alum induced a profound suppression of both anti-DNP and anticarrier IgE responses. The suppression, which was detectable for at least 7 months, was antigen-specific, selective for the IgE class and was sensitive to treatment of spleen cells with anti-Thy-1.2 antibody and complement. Adoptive transfer of spleen cells from donors treated with OA-POL 200 days, 16 days or 200 and 16 days prior to transfer, resulted in different kinetics of suppression in the recipient. The results are consistent with the presence of long-lived IgE-selective T suppressor cell memory. The possibility that separate Ts and Ts memory cell populations are generated is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207