MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989415659 · doi:10.1149/1.3597657

Visualization of Single Atomic Steps on An Ultra-Flat Si(100) Surface by Advanced Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

2011· article· en· W1989415659 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential interference contrast microscopyMaterials scienceInterference (communication)Contrast (vision)Atomic force microscopyConfocalEtching (microfabrication)VisualizationOpticsMicroscopeDifferential (mechanical device)Isotropic etchingOptical microscopeMicroscopyOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyScanning electron microscopeComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceComposite materialTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is revealed for the first time that single atomic steps with a height of 0.14 nm on a Si(100) surface in air can be clearly distinguished by using a laser confocal microscope combined with an advanced differential interference contrast microscope (LCM-DIM). Images of LCM-DIM were acquired in wider areas than 100 μm2 within a shorter period of time than a few second. Furthermore, even in electrolyte solutions, the single atomic step can be seen by the new technique, which will be able to apply to the evaluation of dynamic processes of chemical and electrochemical etching of Si surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it