MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989418670 · doi:10.1140/epja/i2011-11090-7

Odd-odd nuclei as the core-particle-hole systems and chirality

2011· article· en· W1989418670 on OpenAlexafffund
S. G. Rohoziński, L. Próchniak, K. Starosta, Ch. Droste

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal A · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsParity (physics)NeutronAngular momentumSymmetry (geometry)Valence (chemistry)Nuclear structureChirality (physics)Quantum mechanicsExplicit symmetry breakingSymmetry breakingSpontaneous symmetry breakingGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Odd-odd nuclei treated as core-particle-hole systems with various collective cores and various particle-hole configurations are investigated within the Core-Particle-Hole Coupling (CPHC) model. A new symmetry, called the S -symmetry, is identified as a combination of the α -parity of the collective core and the proton-neutron symmetry of the valence proton and neutron in particle-hole configurations involving single-particle states with the same quantum numbers. It is found that the S -symmetric odd-odd nuclei show signatures which are usually considered as fingerprints of nuclear chirality, namely doublet band structure with a particular pattern of electromagnetic transitions. Reported results imply that the rigid rotor with a symmetric valence proton-neutron configuration is only a special case of the system with the novel S -symmetry. Therefore, it is an open question whether the chiral fingerprints discussed so far identify uniquely the orthogonal coupling of angular momentum in the intrinsic system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal ASame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207