MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989443254 · doi:10.1109/tie.2010.2060461

An Iterative Real-Time Nonlinear Electromagnetic Transient Solver on FPGA

2010· article· en· W1989443254 on OpenAlexaff
Yuan Chen, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolverComputer scienceOscilloscopeTransient (computer programming)Nonlinear systemField-programmable gate arrayIterative methodComputational scienceAlgorithmElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A real-time transient simulation of nonlinear elements in transmission networks requires significant computational power. This paper proposes an iterative nonlinear transient solver on a field-programmable gate array. The parallel solver, based on the compensation method and the Newton-Raphson algorithm (continuous and piecewise), is entirely implemented in Very high speed integrated circuit Hardware Description Language. It also involves sparsity techniques, deeply pipelined arithmetic floating-point processing, and parallel Gauss-Jordan elimination. To validate the new solver, two case studies are simulated in real time: surge arrester transients in a series-compensated line and ferroresonance transients in a transformer, with time steps of 5 and 3 μs, respectively. The captured real-time oscilloscope results demonstrate high accuracy of the simulator in comparison to the offline simulation of the original system in the ATP version of electromagnetic transient program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207