MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989453467 · doi:10.1080/02255189.2015.977853

Intrusiveness of urban renewal in India: JNNURM as a development fix

2014· article· en· W1989453467 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Govind Gopakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)ScholarshipCorporate governanceNoveltyGovernment (linguistics)Political sciencePublic administrationUrbanizationEconomic growthEnvironmental planningGeographyRegional scienceBusinessEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multilateral and other donor agencies have sought for some time to intervene within systems of governance in different developing countries, as is evident through procedures that critical scholarship has termed invasive. This paper investigates an effort to reform governance of infrastructures through the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) in India. Gathering data about the mission using government reports, brochures and other secondary material, this paper examines the Mission's managerial orientation and architectural novelty to highlight the intrusive depth and scope of renewal of the country's urban landscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.015
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.013
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développementSame topicUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFrench-language works237,207