Membrane Extraction with a Sorbent Interface for Headspace Monitoring of Aqueous Samples Using a Cap Sampling Device
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A cap-shaped device was employed for headspace sampling. This sampling device coupled to membrane extraction with a sorbent interface (MESI) is intended to perform on-site and on-line aqueous sample monitoring. A laboratory sampling testwas performed both at the water surface and under water, and it showed some advantages in underwater monitoring. A group of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), varying in PDMS/gas and gas/water distribution constants, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o-xylene, and trichloroethylene (TCE), was used for the sampling study. Magnetic stirring of the sample and circulation of the headspace air with a microfan were used for the enhancement of mass transfer between sample matrix and membrane to obtain higher extraction rate and efficiency. The agitation approaches were investigated individually and compared. The results showed that simultaneous agitation in water and air could greatly improve the extraction efficiency. Good linearity and precision and low detection limits were obtained for water-surface monitoring. The study demonstrated that Cap-MESI is a useful tool for field headspace monitoring of volatile organic compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it