MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989477203 · doi:10.1016/s1631-0691(02)01463-4

Influence de la végétation sur l’accumulation de la tourbe au Québec méridional

2002· article· fr· W1989477203 on OpenAlexaffabout
Serge Muller

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Biologies · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatMacrofossilPalynologyHoloceneBogDominance (genetics)CyperaceaeCarexEcologyGeographyOmbrotrophicEricaceaeVegetation (pathology)WetlandGeologyForestryBiologyPollenArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mirabel bog (southern Quebec) was studied with the aim of specifying the past influence of local vegetation on peat accumulation. This influence was essentially translated by the reduction of minerotrophic inputs and peat accumulation induced by the highering of the peatland surface. Extremely rich initial conditions allow to explain the very high accumulations of the beginning of the Holocene, observed in various plant communities, among which Larix forests with ferns and Carex without modern analogues. Moreover, the structure (forest density) and the composition (dominance of Cyperaceae or Ericaceae) of these communities have locally controlled the dynamic of peat accumulation. These results point out the interest of the confrontation between palynological and macrofossil data and the spatialisation of palaeoecological studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComptes Rendus BiologiesSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207