MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989477203 · doi:10.1016/s1631-0691(02)01463-4

Influence de la végétation sur l’accumulation de la tourbe au Québec méridional

2002· article· fr· W1989477203 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Biologies · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatMacrofossilPalynologyHoloceneBogDominance (genetics)CyperaceaeCarexEcologyGeographyOmbrotrophicEricaceaeVegetation (pathology)WetlandGeologyForestryBiologyPollenArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mirabel bog (southern Quebec) was studied with the aim of specifying the past influence of local vegetation on peat accumulation. This influence was essentially translated by the reduction of minerotrophic inputs and peat accumulation induced by the highering of the peatland surface. Extremely rich initial conditions allow to explain the very high accumulations of the beginning of the Holocene, observed in various plant communities, among which Larix forests with ferns and Carex without modern analogues. Moreover, the structure (forest density) and the composition (dominance of Cyperaceae or Ericaceae) of these communities have locally controlled the dynamic of peat accumulation. These results point out the interest of the confrontation between palynological and macrofossil data and the spatialisation of palaeoecological studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it