MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989535647 · doi:10.1039/c3ob42194e

Synthesis of high-mannose 1-thio glycans and their conjugation to protein

2014· article· en· W1989535647 on OpenAlexafffund
Justin J. Bailey, David R. Bundle

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic & Biomolecular Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthAlberta Innovates
KeywordsChemistryMannoseGlycanThio-Conjugated systemUbiquitinCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryGlycoproteinPolymerGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oligosaccharides Man4 and Man5, substructures of the high-mannose glycans of HIV glycoprotein gp120, were synthesized with a terminal 1-thiomannopyranose residue. The anomeric thiol can be readily converted to an azidomethyl aglycone through reaction with dichloromethane and displacement with sodium azide. The resulting oligomannans were then conjugated to ubiquitin utilizing thiol alkylation or azide/alkyne reactive tethers of minimal length. By combining high efficiency conjugation reactions and a short tether, we sought to establish conjugation conditions that would permit high density clustering of oligomannans in conjugate vaccines that could produce antibodies able to bind gp120 and potentially neutralize virus. LC-UV-MS was used to separate, identify and quantify the ubiquitin glycoconjugates with differing degrees of oligomannan incorporation. Binding of the HIV protective monoclonal antibody 2G12 and concanavalin A to microtitre plates coated with glycoconjugates was measured by ELISA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic & Biomolecular ChemistrySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207