MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989546555 · doi:10.1021/jp802042s

A First-Principle Study of Chain Propagation Steps in the Fischer−Tropsch Synthesis on Fe(100)

2008· article· en· W1989546555 on OpenAlexaff
John M. H. Lo, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChain propagationExothermic reactionIsomerizationMethyleneChemistryDensity functional theoryPotential energy surfacePropaneFischer–Tropsch processReactivity (psychology)Reaction mechanismChain terminationSyngasEthylenePolymerizationPhotochemistryPhysical chemistryComputational chemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryAb initio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We presented density functional theory based calculations on the formation and reactivity of C 3 species produced from CO and H 2 over Fe(100). The results indicated that the conversion of syngas to propylene and propane is overall exothermic, and the most stable C 3 surface species are CCCH 2 and CCCH 3 . It was found that the chain propagation on Fe(100) is initiated by the recombination of C and CCCH 2 /CCCH 3 rather than by the coupling reaction of surface vinyl and methylene. The potential energy surface associated with such an alkynyl mechanism has been computed and validated. Furthermore, this alkynyl mechanism has been compared to the conventional alkenyl mechanism in explaining the experimental observations of the 13 C 2 H 4 -probed polymerization over Fe. It was finally found that the two propylene isotopomers observed experimentally in the product mixture are produced from surface ethylene along different reaction paths rather than the isomerization of surface allyl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207