MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989546555 · doi:10.1021/jp802042s

A First-Principle Study of Chain Propagation Steps in the Fischer−Tropsch Synthesis on Fe(100)

2008· article· en· W1989546555 on OpenAlexaff
John M. H. Lo, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChain propagationExothermic reactionIsomerizationMethyleneChemistryDensity functional theoryPotential energy surfacePropaneFischer–Tropsch processReactivity (psychology)Reaction mechanismChain terminationSyngasEthylenePolymerizationPhotochemistryPhysical chemistryComputational chemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryAb initio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We presented density functional theory based calculations on the formation and reactivity of C 3 species produced from CO and H 2 over Fe(100). The results indicated that the conversion of syngas to propylene and propane is overall exothermic, and the most stable C 3 surface species are CCCH 2 and CCCH 3 . It was found that the chain propagation on Fe(100) is initiated by the recombination of C and CCCH 2 /CCCH 3 rather than by the coupling reaction of surface vinyl and methylene. The potential energy surface associated with such an alkynyl mechanism has been computed and validated. Furthermore, this alkynyl mechanism has been compared to the conventional alkenyl mechanism in explaining the experimental observations of the 13 C 2 H 4 -probed polymerization over Fe. It was finally found that the two propylene isotopomers observed experimentally in the product mixture are produced from surface ethylene along different reaction paths rather than the isomerization of surface allyl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207