MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989560209 · doi:10.1210/me.2003-0127

Tpit-Independent Function of NeuroD1(BETA2) in Pituitary Corticotroph Differentiation

2004· article· en· W1989560209 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Lamolet, Gino Poulin, Khoi Chu, François Guillemot, Ming‐Jer Tsai, Jacques Drouin

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Endocrinology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorticotropic cellProopiomelanocortinBiologyAnterior pituitaryMolecular biologyCell biologyGeneGeneticsEndocrinologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NeuroD1(BETA2) and Tpit are cell-specific activators of pituitary proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gene transcription. Expression of both factors slightly precedes that of POMC at embryonic d 12.5 of mouse pituitary development. We now report that NeuroD1(BETA2) is required for early corticotroph differentiation. In agreement with the transcriptional synergism observed between Tpit and basic helix-loop-helix dimers containing NeuroD1(BETA2), POMC expression is delayed in NeuroD1-deficient mice. However, this differentiation defect does not reflect a change of corticotroph commitment as revealed by Tpit expression. The delay of corticotroph terminal differentiation is transient and coincides with the developmental window of NeuroD1 expression in corticotrophs. In contrast to their requirement in other NeuroD1-expressing cells, the neurogenin genes do not appear to be necessary for corticotroph differentiation. Taken together with a similar requirement of Tpit for corticotroph differentiation but not for commitment, the present data indicate that the POMC promoter is a point of convergence for independent corticotroph differentiating signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular EndocrinologySame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207