MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989584814 · doi:10.1592/phco.2005.25.8.1035

Cardiovascular Morbidity Associated with Nonadherence to Statin Therapy

2005· article· en· W1989584814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStatinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To measure the extent of cardiovascular morbidity associated with nonadherence to 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. DATA SOURCE: Linked administrative health databases in Saskatchewan, Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 1221 patients aged 30-70 years who received a new prescription for a statin drug between 1994 and 2001, within 1 year of their first cardiovascular event (i.e., myocardial infarction, unstable angina, ischemic stroke, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA], or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Adherence was measured by the fill frequency (number of prescriptions filled during the observation period divided by months of observation). Patients with a fill frequency of 80% or greater were classified as adherent (661 patients); those with a fill frequency of 60% or less were classified as nonadherent (395 patients). The remaining 165 patients who had adherence rates of 61-79% were excluded from the analysis. The primary end point included a composite of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, PTCA, CABG, and death. Among 1056 patients, adherence was not associated with a reduction of the primary end point. However, patients in the adherent group were half as likely to experience a subsequent myocardial infarction as the patients in the nonadherent group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.99, p=0.047). In patients younger than 65 years (both adherent and not), the associated reduction in myocardial infarction was even more profound (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.46, p=0.001) and was accompanied by a trend for a lower frequency of unstable angina (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13-1.03, p=0.06). In patients 65 years or older (301 patients), adherence was not associated with significant changes in cardiovascular end points. CONCLUSION: A detectable excess of cardiovascular morbidity appears to be associated with nonadherence to statin therapy. Our analysis suggests that many occurrences of myocardial infarction could be prevented with improvements in adherence. Larger studies are necessary to determine the association between adherence and other cardiovascular end points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it