MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989620921 · doi:10.1109/msp.2004.1276119

Technological protection measures in the courts

2004· article· en· W1989620921 on OpenAlexaff
Rajen Akalu, Deepa Kundur

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Rights Management and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital Millennium Copyright ActValue (mathematics)Digital rights managementCopyright lawDigital eraComputer scienceComputer securityInternet privacyLaw and economicsLawIntellectual propertyPolitical scienceThe InternetSociologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is about the similarities and differences that exist between law and engineering. It is about the nature and value of interdisciplinary research and the importance this approach will have in dealing with the problems associated with media piracy and unauthorized use of digital information. The aim of this article is to explore legal reasoning as it applies to the technological protection measures (TPMs). It was done through consideration of the content scramble system (CSS) litigation in the United States under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.025
Scholarly communication0.0160.012
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0210.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing MagazineSame topicDigital Rights Management and SecurityFrench-language works237,207