MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989640809 · doi:10.2307/4127310

The Japanese Business and Economic System: History and Prospects for the 21st Century.

2002· article· en· W1989640809 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrea Boltho

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness historyPolitical scienceBusinessHistoryEconomic history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PART ONE: INTRODUCTION PART TWO: ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Japan's Economic Growth: Past and Present Comments Participatory Employment Practices in Japan Comments Kudoka and the Japanese Worker Comments PART THREE: TRANSFER OF JAPANESE TECHNOLOGY TO ASIA AND NORTH AMERICA Technology Transfer in Asia in Transition: Case Studies of Japanese Companies Comments Japanese Auto Suppliers in North America: A Review of the Literature and Prospects for Research PART FOUR: TECHNOLOGY IN JAPANESE ECONOMIC HISTORY Japanese Technological Development: A Technology Gap Hypothesis and Its Implications Comments Osaka and Tokyo Comments PART FIVE: US-JAPAN RELATIONS AND THE JAPANESE ECONOMY Equity Markets, Political Markets and the Changing Framework of US-Japanese Economic Relations Global Duopolistic Competition of Fujifilm and Kodak: Corporate Strategy and Business-Government Relations Comments Comments on the Kodak-Fuji Dispute, the WTO and Trade and Competition Policies PART SIX: JAPANESE BUSINESS PRACTICES Japan's Business Groups Japanese Corporate Governance and Macroeconomic Problems Comments Environmental Issues and Japanese Firms PART SEVEN: CONCLUSION

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific AffairsSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207