Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les relations internationales utilisent comme postulat récurrent celui de l’État souverain, proposé par la pensée politique en général. Cette dernière raconte de manière quasiment mystique la naissance de cet objet de croyance qui inspire attachement et fidélité. Notre investigation s’attachera à traiter la question de l’état de nature du point de vue philosophique et, à ce titre, à présenter l’apport et l’intérêt que constitue la pensée de Panayis Papaligouras. Ce dernier soutenait en 1941 une thèse de doctorat dans laquelle il développe une approche méthodologique, d’inspiration kantienne, qui constitue une critique de socialité : la théorie du formalisme social. Cette théorie nous permettra de déterminer la conception de l’état de nature que Panayis Papaligouras développe, implicitement, dans son oeuvre. C’est à partir de cette démarche que son entreprise théorique prend corps et que sont définis les concepts de société internationale homogène et hétérogène.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".