The mean summer and fall circulation of western bank on the Scotian shelf
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mean climatological circulation on the central Scotian Shelf was investigated during the summer (August–September) and late fall (November–December) by applying a diagnostic model coupled with a variational approach. Historical Conductivity‐Temperature‐Depth (CTD) profiles, current meter observations and atmospheric climatological data were applied to the model. The reconstructed fields of temperature, salinity and velocity are dynamically balanced and provide estimates of the circulation features on Western Bank for the summer and fall. The availability of new direct current measurements on and around Western Bank enabled us to define the barotropic velocity field and to produce realistic circulation patterns. The primary difference between the summer and fall circulation is the intensification of the surface flow field in the fall. The transport of the Nova Scotia current increases from 0.4 Sv in summer to 0.9 Sv in the fall. At the same time, some qualitative differences were found over Western Bank and in Emerald Basin. Applying the variational assimilation procedure at high resolution (6 km) produced narrow currents (roughly 20–40 km across) in agreement with the structure of the local topography and current meter observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".