MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989672758 · doi:10.1108/03684920010322226

System modeling with fuzzy plug‐ins

2000· article· en· W1989672758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKybernetes · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space AgencyUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFuzzy logicNeuro-fuzzyFuzzy set operationsData miningContext (archaeology)Cluster analysisArtificial intelligenceFuzzy setFuzzy control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we introduce and discuss a concept of fuzzy plug‐ins and investigate their role in system modeling. Fuzzy plug‐ins are rule‐based constructs augmenting a given global model (arising in the form of some regression relationship, neural network, etc.) in the sense that they compensate for the mapping errors produced by the global model. The proposed design method develops around information granules of error defined in the output space and the induced fuzzy relations expressed in the space of input variables. The construction of the linguistic granules is carried out with the aid of context‐based fuzzy clustering – a generalized version of the well‐known FCM algorithm that is well‐suited to the design of fuzzy sets and relations being used as a blueprint of the plug‐ins. An overall modeling architecture combining the global model with its plug‐ins is discussed in detail and a complete design procedure is provided. Finally, some illustrative numerical examples are shown as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it