MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989673152 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.045126

Confined modes in finite-size photonic crystals

2005· article· en· W1989673152 on OpenAlexafffund
Tao Xu, Suxia Yang, Selvakumar V. Nair, Harry E. Ruda

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodPhotonic crystalPhysicsBoundary value problemBoundary (topology)Nonlinear systemReflection (computer programming)Envelope (radar)OpticsFinite differenceCondensed matter physicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsMathematicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The real band structure of finite-size photonic crystals (PCs) is different from the band structure of infinite PCs derived using Bloch's theorem. There are isolated instead of a continuum of modes around a band edge. We use the envelope function approximation (EFA) method to derive simple formulas to describe the frequency and field pattern of the modes in finite-size PCs. The results are compared with those from finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. We observe that the agreement between the results from EFA with a vanishing boundary condition and FDTD is sensitive to the boundary orientation. In addition, although a simple group-velocity-based analysis explains the long lifetime of the confined modes, this explanation is inappropriate for certain structures. In particular, we find boundary orientations, for which the lifetime of the confined modes can be enhanced by orders of magnitude compared with that anticipated from group velocity analysis. We explain this by total internal reflection. Our results demonstrate the utility of the EFA approach in studying the modes in finite-size PCs and reveal the importance of boundary conditions to develop an EFA-based tool for cavity lasers and for studying nonlinear interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207