MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989684893 · doi:10.1002/app.32316

Experimental and statistical study of the effects of material properties, curing agents, and process variables on the production of thermoplastic vulcanizates

2010· article· en· W1989684893 on OpenAlexaff
Milana Trifkovic, M. Sheikhzadeh, Kim Choo, Seyed Alireza Rohani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsLambton CollegeWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCuring (chemistry)PolypropyleneUltimate tensile strengthComposite materialCompression setThermoplasticNatural rubberThermoplastic elastomerElongationPolymerCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A comprehensive experimental study together with statistical analysis was performed to identify the optimal process conditions, materials selection, and curing system for the production of thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) based on EPDM rubber and polypropylene. Two types of curing systems were studied together with five different types of EPDM rubber. The TPV products were assessed according to elastic modulus and degree of swelling (indicators of crosslink density), ultimate tensile strength, ultimate elongation, tear strength, and compression set. A design of experiments method was applied to minimize the number of experiments and to obtain response surface and regression models for this complex and highly interactive system. From the modeling results, optimum values for the influential factors were obtained to achieve the target end product properties. It was found that a phenolic resin‐based curing system gave the best product properties and that the most influential factors were the rubber characteristics (ethylene content, ethylidene norbornene content, and molecular weight) and the polypropylene content in the formulation. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207