A Family of Efficient Sloshing Liquid Dampers for Suppression of Wind-Induced Instabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bluff structures in the form of tall buildings, smokestacks, control towers, bridges, etc., are susceptible to vortex resonance and galloping type of instabilities. One approach to vibration control of such systems is through energy dissipation using sloshing liquid dampers. In this paper we focus on enhancing the energy dissipation efficiency of a rectangular liquid damper through the introduction of two-dimensional obstacles as well as floating particles. The investigation has two phases. To begin with, a parametric free vibration study aimed at the optimization of the obstacle geometry is undertaken to arrive at configurations promising increased damping ratio and hence higher energy dissipation. The study is complemented by an extensive wind tunnel test program, which substantiates the effectiveness of this class of damper in suppressing both vortex resonance and galloping type of instabilities. Simplicity of design, ease of implementation, minimal maintenance, reliability as well as high efficiency make such liquid dampers quite attractive for real-life applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".