Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness of Two Different Transfusion Rates in Children With Severe Anemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We compared the safety and efficacy of 2 transfusion regimens in children with severe anemia (hemoglobin <5 g/dL) and without overt signs of congestive heart failure requiring transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBCs). Forty-three patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A and group B. The transfusion regimens consisted of continuous infusion of PRBC at a rate of 1 mL/kg/h for group A and 3 mL/kg/h for group B. The patients were closely monitored for any clinical signs of heart failure throughout transfusion. Heart and respiratory rate, and arterial blood pressure were measured hourly for 6 hours during transfusion. None of the patients developed any signs of cardiac failure during or after the transfusion. The mean heart rate, respiratory rate, diastolic and systolic blood pressure were similar in both groups throughout transfusion. Group A needed significantly more PRBC units than group B to attain the same hemoglobin increase. Transfusion of PRBC at a rate of 3 mL/kg/h, and at a rate of 1 mL/kg/h, is a safe regimen for children with severe anemia of gradual onset requiring transfusion therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".