MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989713667 · doi:10.1049/ip-com:20045215

Design of an adaptive PI rate controller for streaming media traffic based on gain and phase margins

2006· article· en· W1989713667 on OpenAlexafffund
Ou Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsActive queue managementComputer scienceRouterNetwork congestionComputer networkNetwork packetQueueReal-time computingBuffer overflowExplicit Congestion NotificationRobustness (evolution)Adaptive controlThe InternetControl theory (sociology)Control (management)TCP Friendly Rate Control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An adaptive proportional-integral (PI) rate controller for best-effort streaming media traffic in the Internet is proposed. Classical control theory is employed in the control design, which allows the user to achieve good performance of active queue management (AQM) in the router by specifying the proper gain and phase margins. The proposed adaptive PI rate controller will self-tune only when the number of active controlled source nodes changes or the average round trip time becomes longer. The adaptive PI rate controller located in the router can calculate the advertised source transmission rate for the streaming media traffic based on the instantaneous queue length of the buffer, which clamps the steady value of the queue length around the target buffer occupancy. Every controlled source node always transmits streaming media traffic through IP packets into the network at the maximum allowed transmission rate, thus providing the best-effort service traffic and maximising the bandwidth utilisation of the Internet. Our OPNET simulations demonstrate that the rate-based AQM control system can adapt to the fluctuation of the uncontrolled guaranteed traffic very well, thus providing the network with good stability robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - CommunicationsSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207