MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The renin–angiotensin system: peptides and enzymes beyond angiotensin II

2005· review· en· W1989720576 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy L. Reudelhuber

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenin–angiotensin systemAngiotensin IIPharmacologyAngiotensin-converting enzymeDiseaseBlood pressureChemistryMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although current pharmacotherapy for cardiovascular disease focuses on the inhibition of angiotensin II production and action, several other biologically active peptides are produced by the renin-angiotensin system. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent biochemical and physiological studies have shown that non-angiotensin II peptides, including angiotensins III, IV and 1-7, modulate blood pressure or cardiac function through novel mechanisms. Animal models support the notion that these peptides are physiologically important. SUMMARY: Although the role of these peptides has not yet resulted in the development of new therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, they hold promise for identification of complimentary targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionSame topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207