MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989731782 · doi:10.1159/000351031

Synaptogenesis in the Foetal and Neonatal Cerebellar System. 2. Pontine Nuclei and Cerebellar Cortex

2013· article· en· W1989731782 on OpenAlexafffund
Harvey B. Sarnat, Laura Flores‐Sarnat, Roland N. Auer

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neuroscience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsSynaptogenesisNeuroscienceCerebellar cortexSynaptophysinBiologyDeep cerebellar nucleiCerebellar vermisCerebellumSynaptic vesicleAnatomyPonsPontine nucleiVesicleImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise temporal and spatial sequences of synaptogenesis were demonstrated in 172 human foetuses and neonates post-mortem in transverse paraffin sections of pons and cerebellar vermis and hemispheres, using synaptophysin immunoreactivity of this protein of synaptic vesicular walls. The pontine nuclei exhibit a transitory patchy pattern not predicted from the uniform histology and reminiscent of the corpus striatum; synaptic vesicle reactivity appears at 20 weeks and is uniform by 34 weeks. In the cerebellar cortex, the vermis matures sooner than the cerebellar hemispheres and the paravermal portions earlier than the lateral folia. The earliest synapses occur around the somata of Purkinje neurons and later in the internal granular layer, but synaptic glomeruli are not well formed until after 26 weeks. The normal patterns here shown, together with earlier data of the Guillain-Mollaret triangle, provide controls for the interpretation of synaptic delay or precociousness and other pathological patterns in malformations, genetic/metabolic conditions and prenatal acquired insults affecting the human foetus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental NeuroscienceSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207