MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989781991 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2002.804251

On the deployment of RED on shared-memory buffers

2002· article· en· W1989781991 on OpenAlexaff
Farshid Agharebparast, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQueueing theoryRandom early detectionSoftware deploymentQueueComputer networkShared resourceScheme (mathematics)Resource allocationDistributed computingShared memoryMathematical optimizationParallel computingNetwork congestionMathematicsActive queue managementOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have proposed novel buffer management algorithms for the deployment of random early detection (RED) on class-based queues with shared-memory buffers, where the total buffer is shared under complete sharing, sharing with minimum allocation, and complete partitioning policies. This letter provides an analytical evaluation of these schemes by deriving the drop probability equations using the traditional M/M/1/K queueing model. This letter also provides a comparison of the delay and loss ratio of these scheme under TCP flows. Sharing with minimum allocation is shown to give the best performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207