Ab Initio and QM/MM Study of Electron Addition on the Disulfide Bond in Thioredoxin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thioredoxin controls the intracellular redox potential through a disulfide/dithiol couple. Under conditions of oxidative stress, this protein functions via one-electron exchange, in which formation of the disulfide radical anion occurs. Combined quantum mechanical (QM) and molecular mechanical (MM) calculations using two- and three-level ONIOM schemes were performed on the thioredoxin (Trx) protein of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in its oxidized-disulfide and one-electron-reduced forms. In both cases, the active site disulfide moiety was described at the MP2(fc)/6-31+G(d) level, and larger regions of varying sizes around the active site were described at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level. The remainder of the 112 residues and 33 water molecules of the crystal structure (PDB entry 1EP7) were described by the AMBER force field. Adiabatic electron affinities were calculated for the disulfide bond in all systems. Separate QM or QM/QM calculations were performed on the QM regions to establish the role of the remainder of the protein on the active site properties. The radical anion species becomes more stable as the number of amide groups in the vicinity increases. One-electron reduction potentials were calculated for the small molecule models, and approximated for the protein for which the values are similar to the experimental one (approximately 0 V). This high reduction potential is due to interaction with the charged end of Lys40, as indicated by mutation in silico to norleucine. The inclusion of the protonated Asp30 side chain and a water molecule in the QM region leads to an increase in the electron affinity. Proton transfer from the Asp30 side chain to the Cys39 sulfur in the radical anion species is strongly disfavored. The radical anion is more stable than the protonated form, which is consistent with experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".