High Incidence of Invasive Aspergillosis Associated with Intestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease following Nonmyeloablative Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains a major complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). In contrast to conventional HSCT, few investigators have examined risk factors of IA associated with nonmyeloablative (NMA) regimens characterized by outpatient administration, immunosuppression rather than cytoreduction, and short duration of neutropenia posttransplant. We report our results on a cohort of 125 patients treated homogenously who received a 6/6 matched sibling NMA HSCT designed to be performed on an outpatient basis. Conditioning regimen included fludarabine (30 mg/m(2) x 5 days) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m(2) x 5 days) followed by reinfusion of a minimum of 4 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Overall, 13 patients developed IA (5 proved, 6 probable, 2 possible) 44-791 days (median 229) after NMA HSCT, with a risk of 7% at 1, 11% at 2, and 15% at 3 years. Patients who suffered from IA had poorer overall survival (crude hazard ratio 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-5.4; P = .045). Intestinal aGVHD or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was significantly associated with IA at 1 (27% versus 3%, P = .003), 2 (27% versus 8%, P = .01), and 3 years (37% versus 10%, P = .005). The use of daclizumab was also significantly associated with IA at 3 years (47% versus 12%, P = .02). Age, sex, diagnosis, previous autologous transplant, duration of neutropenia, occurrence of cytomegalovirus viremia, duration of steroids or MMF intake, aGVHD, cGVHD, and cumulative number of days spent in hospital were not associated with IA. After multivariate analysis, intestinal GVHD remained the only statistically significant risk factor for IA at 1 (P = .003), 2 (P = .01), and 3 years (P = .005). We conclude that in NMA HSCT, the risk of IA increases over time and is significantly associated with intestinal GVHD. Because there is currently no surrogate in vitro markers of immunocompetence following NMA HSCT, this clinical finding is of particular importance to identify a population at higher risk who should be targeted for antimold prophylaxis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".