MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989811829 · doi:10.1002/prot.20846

Dependence of folding dynamics and structural stability on the location of a hydrophobic pair in β‐hairpins

2006· article· en· W1989811829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReptationFolding (DSP implementation)NucleationLattice proteinDownhill foldingChemical physicsMolecular dynamicsProtein foldingMonte Carlo methodStability (learning theory)ChemistryStatistical physicsCrystallographyHydrophobic effectPhysicsThermodynamicsPhi value analysisComputational chemistryComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the dependence of folding time, nucleation site, and stability of a model beta-hairpin on the location of a cross-strand hydrophobic pair, using a coarse-grained off-lattice model with the aid of Monte Carlo simulations. Our simulations have produced 6500 independent folding trajectories dynamically, forming the basis for extensive statistical analysis. Four folding pathways, zipping-out, middle-out, zipping-in, and reptation, have been closely monitored and discussed in all seven sequences studied. A hydrophobic pair placed near the beta-turn or in the middle section effectively speed up folding; a hydrophobic pair placed close to the terminal ends or next to the beta-turn encourages stability of the entire chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it